By Tim Harris · February 23, 2026
“Where horsepower meets conversation”
Let’s say something out loud that many experienced drivers quietly feel but rarely say publicly:
Modern sports cars are increasingly simulations.
Not bad.
Not slow.
Not poorly engineered.
Just… simulated.
Steering feel is simulated.
Brake feel is simulated.
Engine noise is simulated.
Even the emotional connection between driver and machine is increasingly curated by software.
And the most fascinating part?
Most drivers don’t realize it’s happening.
Real Steering vs Simulated Steering — The Difference You Feel But Can’t Always Explain
In an analog car, steering feel isn’t designed.
It simply exists.
You turn the wheel → mechanical components move → forces travel back through the steering rack → your hands receive raw information.
You feel:
Tire load
Surface texture
Grip limits
Micro-corrections from the chassis
Nothing filters it. Nothing edits it.
The car speaks directly to you.
Modern steering systems, however, increasingly act like translators.
Sensors collect data.
Software interprets it.
Electric motors generate feedback designed to feel right.
And here’s the uncomfortable truth:
👉 You are no longer feeling the road directly.
You are feeling what the algorithm believes the road should feel like.
It’s closer to a high-end sim racing wheel running iRacing than a hydraulic rack from an older Porsche or Ferrari.
Yes — the steering can feel precise.
But precision is not the same as authenticity.
Brake Feel: From Mechanical Dialogue to Digital Suggestion
Older braking systems were brutally honest.
Your foot pushed fluid.
The fluid pushed calipers.
The pads bit into rotors.
Everything you felt came from physics.
Modern brake-by-wire systems change that relationship entirely.
You press the pedal.
The computer reads your input.
Then decides:
How much hydraulic braking to apply
How much regenerative braking to blend
How aggressively to stabilize the car
What you feel under your foot is often artificially calibrated.
It’s no longer purely mechanical feedback.
It’s software deciding how braking should feel.
The result?
Perfectly consistent braking — but often emotionally distant.
The Sound You Hear Isn’t Always Real Either
Let’s talk about something enthusiasts hate admitting:
Many modern sports cars amplify, modify, or outright generate engine sound digitally.
Examples?
BMW’s “Active Sound Design” piping synthetic engine noise through speakers.
Porsche’s Sound Symposer systems enhancing intake noise.
Some AMG models electronically augmenting exhaust tone.
EV performance cars generating artificial soundtracks entirely.
Even internal combustion sports cars increasingly rely on software to shape what you hear.
Which means:
👉 The experience is engineered for emotional effect — not mechanical honesty.
Why Manufacturers Did This (And Why It’s More Profitable)
Manufacturers will say this shift is about:
Efficiency
Safety
Emissions compliance
Packaging constraints
Hybrid integration
And yes — those are real reasons.
But there’s another reason rarely discussed:
👉 Software-driven systems are scalable and cheaper long-term.
Drive-by-wire and steer-by-wire reduce mechanical complexity.
They allow:
Shared platforms across multiple models.
Digital tuning instead of physical redesign.
Faster development cycles.
Lower manufacturing costs.
And most importantly:
They allow manufacturers to “tune feel” with software updates instead of expensive mechanical engineering.
In other words:
Simulated feel isn’t just engineering evolution.
It’s a business model.
The Cars That Refuse to Simulate — And Why Enthusiasts Worship Them
The irony is that as simulation increases, the cars that remain mechanically authentic become more special.
Examples frequently praised by enthusiasts:
👉 Porsche 911 GT3 (hydraulic-era models especially) — celebrated for raw steering communication.
👉 Lotus Emira — one of the last cars prioritizing mechanical feedback over digital filtering.
👉 Mazda MX-5 Miata — still delivering honest steering feel in an increasingly synthetic world.
👉 Older Ferrari V8 models like the 458 — often described as the last truly analog-feeling modern Ferraris.
👉 Corvette C7 Z06 — rawer, less filtered compared to newer electronically managed platforms.
These cars aren’t necessarily faster.
They’re simply more honest.
And honesty feels rare now.
The Invisible Dulling of the Driving Experience
Here’s the most controversial part:
Drive-by systems don’t just change the experience.
They subtly dull it — without the driver realizing it.
Because when software filters feedback:
You lose micro-information.
You lose unpredictability.
You lose mechanical texture.
The car becomes easier to drive.
More stable.
More polished.
But also less alive.
And because performance numbers keep improving, most drivers assume nothing meaningful was lost.
The Future: Perfect Simulation
The trajectory is clear.
Driving feel is becoming software-defined.
Manufacturers will soon be able to:
Upload new steering personalities.
Adjust brake feel via updates.
Modify engine sound digitally.
Driving modes won’t just change performance.
They’ll change simulated reality.
And maybe that’s inevitable.
But it raises a serious question for enthusiasts:
Are we driving machines anymore…
Or are we driving curated experiences designed by algorithms?
— Tim Harris
What did you think of today's newsletter?
📩 Don’t keep Full Throttle Talk a secret—share it with a friend, family member, or colleague. Let’s spread the fun!
🧠 Got an article or market take? Send it in—we’ll feature our favorites in an upcoming issue.
💬 Want your question featured on the next show? DM us on Instagram or reply to this newsletter.
